ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ventilatory parameters measured soon after initiation of mechanical ventilation have limited ability to predict outcome of COVID-19-related ARDS. We hypothesized that ventilatory parameters measured after one week of mechanical ventilation might differ between survivors and non-survivors. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven subjects with COVID-related ARDS had gas exchange and lung mechanics assessed on the day of intubation and one week later. The main parameters of interest were PaO2 /FIO2 , ventilatory ratio (VR), respiratory system compliance (CRS), and a composite score that was calculated as (PaO2 /FIO2 /100) × CRS/VR. The primary outcome was death in the ICU. RESULTS: Of the 127 subjects, 42 (33%) died in the ICU and 85 (67%) were successfully extubated. On the day of intubation, PaO2 /FIO2 , CRS, and composite score of survivors and non-survivors were similar, but survivors had a lower VR. At one week, as compared to survivors, non-survivors had a significantly higher VR (2.04 ± 0.76 vs 1.60 ± 0.43, P < .001), lower CRS (27.4 ± 6.4 mL/cm H2O vs 32.4 ± 9.3 mL/cm H2O, P = .002), and lower composite score (20.6 ± 11.9 vs 34.5 ± 18.6, P < .001), with no statistically significant difference in PaO2 /FIO2 (137 ± 49 vs 155 ± 48, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with COVID ARDS, parameters that reflect dead space (VR), lung mechanics (CRS), and a combined score that included PaO2 /FIO2 , VR, and CRS differed between survivors and non-survivors after one week of mechanical ventilation but with considerable overlap of values between survivors and non-survivors.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 virus-induced pandemic has been the deadliest pandemic to have occurred in two generations, besides HIV/AIDS. Epidemiologists predicted that the SARS-Cov 2 pandemic would not be able to be brought under control until a majority of the world's population had been inoculated with safe and effective vaccines. A world-wide effort to expedite vaccine development was successful. Previous research for vaccines to prevent SARS and MERS, also coronaviruses, was vital to this success. Nanotechnology was essential to this vaccine development. Key elements are presented here to better understand the relationship between nanomedicine and the COVID-19 vaccine development. METHODS: NLM PubMed searches for COVID-19 vaccines, nanotechnology and nanomedicine were done. There were 6911 articles screened, 235 of which were deemed appropriate to this subject and utilized here, together with two landmark nanomedicine texts used to expand understanding of the basic science of nanotechnology. RESULTS: SARS-Cov 2, caused by the COVID-19 virus, was first recognized in China in December of 2019 and was declared as a pandemic in March of 2020. The RNA sequence was identified in January of 2020. Within 4 months of the viral genome being released, over 259 vaccines had been in development. The World Health Organization (WHO) anticipated a vaccine with a 50-80% efficacy to be developed within 1-2 years. Ahead of schedule, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the emergency authorization approval for two mRNA vaccines within 11 month's time. Nanotechnology was the key to the success of these rapidly developed, safe and effective vaccines. A brief review of pertinent basic science principles of nanomedicine are presented. The development of COVID vaccines is reviewed. Future considerations are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Control of the COVID-19 SARS-Cov2 pandemic benefitted from nanomedicine principles used to develop highly effective, yet very safe and relatively inexpensive vaccines. These nanovaccines can be much more easily altered to adjust for viral variants than traditional live or inactivated legacy-type whole virus vaccines.